Crypto in 2026: where the real utility landed.

I've been operating around blockchain businesses since 2017. I've spoken at ETHCC, World Blockchain Summit Dubai, ran a Twitter Space with Decentralized Club, sat on panels with people who were absolutely sure the next bull market was six weeks away — for six years. I've seen four full cycles. And I've watched almost every category of crypto product fail, get mocked, get reborn, and either die or quietly turn into infrastructure.

2026 is the first year where I think you can clearly see what survived. Not because we hit the top of a cycle — though we are deep into one — but because the failure modes have stopped being interesting. The categories that didn't work are gone. The ones that did are operating at a scale that makes the question of whether crypto matters somewhat redundant.

Here's my honest map of what landed and what didn't.

What's real now

1. Stablecoins as a payment rail

This is the one. USDC and USDT have collectively settled trillions of dollars per year in on-chain transfers for several years running. The market structure is no longer speculative — it's people moving money. Cross-border B2B payments, remittances out of Argentina and Turkey and Nigeria, the back-end of fintech apps that don't show users they're using crypto at all.

The 2024–2025 wave of regulatory clarity in the US (GENIUS Act direction) and EU (MiCA) gave issuers the operating cover they needed. Stablecoins are now boring infrastructure. That's a compliment.

The next leg here is consumer-payment integration. Most consumers in 2026 still don't pay for things in stablecoins because the merchant doesn't accept them. That gap closes in the next 24 months as merchant-acquirer integrations roll out.

2. Spot ETFs and the institutional access layer

The 2024 spot Bitcoin ETF approvals, followed by the spot Ether approvals, did something that's underappreciated: they removed the operational excuse for treasuries and pension funds to stay out. You can now allocate to BTC and ETH through a brokerage account, with custody handled by Coinbase, Fidelity, BlackRock or BNY. The asset class has institutional plumbing.

You don't have to like Bitcoin to recognise this changes the cap-table for crypto investment. You can deploy capital without ever touching a private key. That makes the asset accessible to people who wouldn't have touched it in 2018.

3. Real-world asset (RWA) tokenisation

This is the category that took longest to land but is now substantive. BlackRock's tokenised money-market fund (BUIDL) crossed multi-billion AUM. Treasury bills are being tokenised at scale by Ondo, Mountain, others. The yield is real, the rails are non-custodial, and the addressable market is everyone with USD exposure who wants to earn the risk-free rate without an account at JP Morgan.

This is going to keep growing. The endgame is most fixed-income instruments having a tokenised version. The 2030 question isn't whether — it's which chain.

4. Consumer carbon — and other on-chain compliance assets

The category I run in. The thesis: any asset where the value of the asset depends on integrity (no double-counting, no hidden re-sale, public retirement), and where the buyers are distributed enough that a centralised registry won't be trusted, is a category where on-chain settlement wins.

Carbon credits are the obvious one. But the same shape works for renewable energy certificates, water credits, biodiversity credits, and any future ecosystem-services market. The integrity layer is the chain. The market layer is the merchant. We're early.

5. Stablecoin-denominated lending and the death of bank-rate dominance

USDC at 4–5% on Coinbase and similar venues, secured by short-duration T-bills, is now competing directly with high-yield savings accounts at retail banks. The retail bank can't really match without margin compression. The crypto-native venues will keep winning until the banks restructure or the central-bank rate cycle breaks down.

What's dead or cosmetic

Memecoins as a sustainable category

I'm going to be blunt: memecoins are gambling, not finance. The "fair launch" rhetoric is marketing for a zero-sum game where the early insiders extract from the late entrants. The category had a moment. The moment is over.

This isn't a moralistic claim. It's a market-structure claim. Memecoins do not produce cash flows, they do not represent claims on assets, and they do not create durable network effects. The only thing they do is rotate capital. When capital stops rotating, the category collapses. That's where we are.

NFT speculation as PFP/collectible

The 2021–2022 jpeg market was a phase. Some collections retain cultural value. Most collapsed. The technology survives in different forms — ticketing, identity, in-game items, on-chain receipts (including IMPT's carbon retirements) — but as an investment asset class, jpegs are dead.

"DeFi 2.0" yield farms

The unsustainable-yield era is over. The protocols that survived (Aave, Maker, Uniswap) survived because they have real product-market fit and real fee revenue. The protocols that didn't were running ponzinomics dressed up as token incentives.

Layer-1 tribalism as a thesis

Most layer-1 chains are now indistinguishable to the end user. Whether your transaction settles on Ethereum, Solana, Base, Arbitrum, or somewhere else, the user experience is the same and the cost is roughly the same. The "this chain is going to win" thesis was a 2017–2021 framework. It's not how investors evaluate the space anymore.

The bigger pattern

Across all of this, the through-line is that crypto stopped being about crypto. The categories that landed are categories where on-chain settlement enables something that wasn't possible before — global stable-value transfer, institutional-grade BTC exposure, tokenised fixed income, verifiable carbon retirement. None of these are crypto-as-rebellion. They're crypto-as-infrastructure.

This is what people who came in during the cycles and left between cycles miss. The cyclical asset-price story isn't where the value is. The value is in the surfaces where on-chain settlement closes a real-world gap — and where the user doesn't need to know about the chain at all.

Where I'm allocating attention

For my own analytical work, I track three things:

• Stablecoin merchant integration. The next leg of stablecoin adoption is direct merchant acceptance. The fintech that wins this becomes the next Visa. There are five companies in serious contention.
• RWA tokenisation expansion beyond Treasuries. Equities, corporate bonds, real estate, private credit. Each has different regulatory shape but the same underlying primitive.
• Compliance-asset markets. Carbon today, biodiversity next, water, RECs, anywhere a market needs verifiable retirement to function. This is where IMPT operates and where I expect the next decade of climate-tech capital to flow.

If you're trying to understand 2026 crypto and you're still thinking in terms of bull market / bear market / which chain wins — you're using the wrong frame. The frame that fits 2026 is: which surfaces benefit from on-chain settlement, which don't, and which incumbents are exposed.

That's where the work is.

← Back to analysis